Village of Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard is currently the worst mayor in America and could go down as the worst mayor in American history. Here are some of her low lights since she declared herself the "super mayor" after she was elected in 2021. She set up a 24/7 police security detail because she claimed that she was unsafe in a town of only 6,000 people. This detail cost the taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars per year to have the officers work overtime solely to drive her around town to work and to the store. She set up a non-profit organization that she started by taking $150,000 out of the village funds. She refused to approve business licenses and permits to any owner in the village that refused to pay her a bribe on the side. She established a local ordinance to reduce the annual salary of the mayor from $200,000 to $20,000 only after her tenure as mayor is completed. She set up this ordinance to ensure that nobody would have any interest to run against her when the monetary incentive was taken away from the opposition. She had political billboards put up all over the southern suburbs of Chicago. In Illinois, it is illegal to use billboards for political use when someone is an elected official. These billboards were paid for by taxpayers' money. In her three years as mayor, she has not paid any bill that is owed by the Village of Dolton. She paid for trips for her and her entourage to Las Vegas and to Mobile. During the trip to Las Vegas, one of the males in the group sexually assaulted one of the females in the group in a hotel room. She is currently being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI). Results of an independent investigation has shown that when she became mayor, the village had a surplus of $5.6 million. Currently, the village is now in debt by $3.65 million. She used the village's credit card to buy $40,000 worth of furniture from Amazon.com and Wayfair.com for her own personal use and bought $10,000 worth of clothing and other personal items from Target and Walgreens. If you can think of any mayor worse than her, then please leave a comment.
The Upcoming About Face Posted on September 4, 2024 by john Dear Friends, It seems to me, should Trump win, we’ll watch the fastest about face mankind has ever witnessed. Democrats will flip from demanding prison for election deniers, to, arguing that denying elections is a constitutional obligation. Exposing their hypocrisy to anyone with eyes willing to see. So absolute is the lack of self awareness of the left, they won’t even be able to understand their own hypocrisy, when it’s pointed out to them. I predict riots in every major city in America if Trump somehow wins. Despite the tsunami of election fraud that’s stacked up against him… and us. The progressives will call out their Brown Shirts, Antifa and BLM, to sow chaos, and ideally, make the nation ungovernable. Meanwhile, the same deep state that jails election deniers, will do an about face on election denying. With millions of illegal aliens set to vote, this will be the dirtiest election since the last one. They seem to get more corrupt and more corrupt election cycle by election cycle. Mail in voting is the pinnacle of corruption. With it’s sister peak of digital voting. Both are designed for election fraud. Then you have courts actually overruling the legislature and making it illegal to require voter ID, or even ask for citizenship, when registering to vote! Despite the US Constitution giving election powers explicitly to the legislature. In Post Constitutional Amerika, the courts have no need of the Constitution’s antiquated ideas. Between the courts and the administrative state, the legislature has become redundant… but dangerous. So must be controlled. By the FBI, CIA, along with mail in and digital election fraud. The deep loathing the American people now have for the elitist, globalist anti human faction, radiates from society like heat from a fire. Despite the blinding gaslighting of polls, lies and censorship, the progressive faction is more hated now than in the 1940s. When they exposed themselves as demons before. Even traditional democrat voters are fed up with the corruption, hypocrisy and anti humanism. In Europe, of all places, populist conservative parties are becoming ascendant. All adding up to make this year a landslide for the conservative faction in the US. Which the elite plan on stopping with election fraud. If that fails though… the progressive faction will turn to open violence again. As they did the first time Trump was elected… when they burned down DC. This time the progressives will burn down America in their wrath. Cities with strong democrat rule will be the hardest hit. As in the summer of love 2020, when democrats destroyed their cities, in “Fiery but mostly peaceful” riots, and passed Covid across the land, in their rage over Trump’s escaping the Russian collusion frame… pretending it was over a drug addict’s death by fentanyl, while in police custody. In 2017 the progressive faction burned down DC. Damage that I hear still hasn’t been repaired. If the election fraud fails and Trump wins the electoral college, the elite will go insane. Not that they’re actually sane now. But that madness will turn into wrath. Because they’ve broken every law there is, to steal from us, stay in power and limit their foes. The criminal elite are not only angry about losing power and privilege. but with their crimes they’re afraid of consequences. They are, after all, the worst criminals in human history. Tamerlane killed millions of Hindus mercilessly… but he didn’t create a virus that killed tens of millions. Hitler started the second world war… but he didn’t use biological or chemical weapons. John Wayne Gacey murdered little kids… but he didn’t sterilize them and manipulate them into suicide. These globalist elites in power today have no morals, ethics or standards. They’re literally demons. That’s why they’ll cross any bridge, then turn and burn it… to stay in power. The globalist elitist faction, is full of pride, fear and wrath. Such people are more dangerous than a pack of rabid dogs… and they can turn on a dime. Sincerely, John Pepin
The Moral High Ground Posted on August 28, 2024 by john Dear Friends, It seems to me, leftists consider themselves on the moral high ground, as they defend the gutter. On every question the progressive faction takes the Malthusian anti human side. While claiming to defend humanity. A normal person can’t imagine acting and speaking in such opposition. It would psychically rip a regular person in half. The elitist progressive elite however have evolved beyond the mere need for cognitive resonance. They consider themselves to be Nietzsche’s Ubermen. Morality is what they say it is, enforced by their willingness to use violence to silence. Because in the fevered fantasies of the favored, whatever they want is moral, no matter how heinous it is. Since they’re the elite and anything the elite want, is by Thrasymachus’ definition… moral. If the goal is a utopia that’s so great, it makes the dead in heaven want to come back, no atrocity is out of bounds. In that case, defending the immoral, to create the super moral, must be moral? Wouldn’t it? No way such an argument could be considered circular could it? Nevertheless, that’s effectively the justification a myriad of tyrants have used to rationalize their atrocities. “We’re getting our hands dirty today but the future will thank us.” Is as circular as a tire. Who considers the Nazis heroes? Or the Young Turks? Other than psychopaths who want to repeat their atrocities. Because no theoretical future utopia justifies atrocities today. The means taint the ends. Moreover, only evil ends require evil means, no matter how pretty it may sound. The ends never elevate evil means to the moral high ground. The self justification of the progressive movement is amazing in its lack of self awareness. The self blind self justifying is like the blind running a steeplechase full bore. There’s no way it doesn’t end in an emergency room visit. I suppose that’s what becomes of a person who lives in an echo chamber atop an ivory tower. Without input from society they become ever less rational. Thus forcing go alongers to go along. Openly avowing the things they once claimed they despised. To go along with the elite’s self justification. Meanwhile, the rest of us look at them and the elite leading them to absurdity, with absolute astonishment. Like when they take private jets to Davos to discuss how to limit our use of fossil fuels. Believing that gives them the moral high ground. Talk about a lack of self awareness. In every question, the progressive globalist faction takes the anti human one. They staunchly advocate for the sterilization of children on a whim, abortion to birth (and after to be honest), making people dependent on the state, claiming there’s over population, etc… There’s not one stance of the left today that would result in more people, less war and more wealth. Every position they take drains the wealth, population and humanity from the world… in an effort to make it better. Their foundational ethos is, the less people the better. They as much as said so on the Georgia Guide stones before someone blew them up. Right under the watchful gaze of 24/7 cameras. Like Epstein’s “suicide.” Let’s face it, taking the position there needs to be less people… isn’t the moral high ground. If you or I had pushed for more taxes our entire careers in government, then were caught cheating on our taxes, the hypocrisy would make us flee the lime light, like Golum. Were we to find ourselves in the position of defending pedophilia, you and I would reassess our position. If we demanded people get a shot, and prove it before traveling, then discovered that shot had killed millions with little if any protection… you or I would not only be shamed to oblivion, but prosecuted to life in prison. Then there’s the censorship, in the name of stopping mis and disinformation. Censorship that killed people because it stifled the truth. In each case the elite defended the immoral, as their lackeys in the mockingbird media knighted them, as taking the moral high ground. Showing who we can’t trust. Sincerely, John Pepin
Biden’s Executive Order Overrules the Constitution Executive Order: noun – An order issued by the President based upon authority specifically granted to the executive branch as by the U.S. Constitution or a congressional act. As an example: the National Security Agency was created by an executive order. The U.S. Constitution does not directly define or give the president authority to issue presidential actions, which include executive orders, presidential memoranda and proclamations. Instead, this implied and accepted power derives from Article II of the Constitution, which states that as head of the executive branch and commander in chief of the armed forces, the president “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” Unfortunately, this poorly defined “legal act” by the Executive is now a means by which Congressional rejection of the President’s desired end is simply avoided without any constitutional right for the Executive Branch to do so! In other words, the Congress can plead with its constituents when there is an undesirable EO that it could do nothing to prevent “because.” This is the same type of governance that has happened so often in the past when our “elected representatives” used the Supreme Court to pass “decisions” that put into place “laws” rejected by the American people. It has in fact become an “end run” around government supposedly “of, for and by the People.” The results of such an action are just as bad as one supposes they will be! On January 27th, 2021, “President” Joe Biden signed Executive Order 14008 mandating the Department of the Interior (DOI), in consultation with the Department of Commerce (DOC) and other agencies produce a report to the National Climate Task Force (yes, we have such a thing probably also created by an EO!) recommending steps for conserving at least 30% of U.S. lands and waters by the year 2030. This is the first step in designing a process to solicit public and stakeholder “input” on a strategy for achieving a particular agenda labeled “30x30.” The Administration’s policy, as written in 14008, calls for the U.S. to conserve at least 30 percent of U.S. lands and waters by 2030 (hence the 30x30 terminology). This goal supports, but is not identical to 30x30 goals that have been proposed under the Convention on Biological Diversity and that have been promoted by many countries and environmental nongovernmental organizations (ENGOs). Needless to say, this entire campaign is beloved by the “Green” or environmental movement no matter what the political and legal effects might be! Save the snail darter by all means!! The Executive Order did not specifically define the level of conservation that would be applied to measure progress toward the 30 x 30 target — Federal agencies will conduct further stakeholder engagement on formulating the concept or definition of “conserve.” One thing that we do know, however, is that all the land involved will belong to the Government no matter who now actually holds title to it. This is made manifest by a little-noticed provision buried deep in 14008, “Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, Create Jobs, and Restore Scientific Integrity Across the Federal Government,” that has emerged as one of the gravest threats facing ordinary Americans, at a time when such threats are legion. (Isn’t it interesting that the worst of the federal schemes sound so good in public pronouncements regarding their intentions, actions and results!) Anyway, the EO’s Section 219 sets the goal of “protecting” at least 30% of the nation’s land and water by 2030. The benevolent term “protection” means putting this land and water (mostly land) off limits to any productive use in perpetuity – that is, forever! To accomplish this goal, the federal government will have to buy up – through eminent domain or other pressures on landowners making them “willing sellers” of their property – millions of acres of private land. So, to save the planet from what we have been assured by our elite rulers is a “climate crisis,” the government must gobble up more land and have it “managed” by the bureaucrats in Washington who can’t manage their natural bodily functions never mind a (supposed) planetary crisis! The federal government already owns about 27% (640 million acres) of the nation’s land, the bulk of which is administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) with most of the rest remaining in the clutches of the National Forest Service, National Park Service, and an assortment of wildlife refuges along with military bases that are quickly bowing to the WOKE agenda by changing their names from Confederate heroes to anything else. Of course, our morally feeble Congress replenished the Land and Water Conservation Fund in 2020, giving the feds an annual supply of cash to use in socializing even more private land. And in February of 2021, the Biden White House struck down a Trump-era EO giving local governments a say in federal land acquisitions within their jurisdictions. Alarmed by what promises to be the biggest land grab in American history, governors from 15 states questioned whether the Biden administration has the legal authority to pursue its 30 X 30 plan. In an open letter to Biden, many Governors wrote the following: “[We] are not aware of any statutory or constitutional authority for the President, the U.S. Department of Interior, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or any other federal agency to set aside 30 percent of all land and water in the United States. Nowhere in the laws of our nation is the authority delegated to the President or executive branch agencies to unilaterally change the policies governing land use in America.” The governors involved represented states stretching from Alaska and Idaho to Tennessee and Alabama. Their open letter follows a March 16 letter to Biden by 64 members of the Congressional Western Caucus, underscoring the special situation of western states, where 90% of federally-owned land is located. “Western states will be disproportionately impacted by policies set in place to achieve the 30 by 30 goal, which we fear will impact revenues derived from jobs that depend on multiple-use public lands,” the letter states. “Our lands and our waters must remain open to activities that support our rural economies and help us achieve our agriculture, timber, recreation, energy, and mineral needs.” The threat posed by the 30 X 30 plan to predominantly rural employment is key to understanding the goal of the agenda. Ultimately, 30 X 30 is about what writer Ron Arnold calls “rural cleansing.” Put enough regulatory pressure on natural-resource industries so that many are forced out of business, and you will also destroy the livelihoods of the people who make their living in those industries. Eventually, enough will leave for urban areas in search of work. This is how rural cleansing works, and the people behind 30 X 30 know it. The whole agenda is to depopulate rural areas driving people into 15 minutes “cities” (i.e. hi-tech concentration camps!) that will be established in order to make us easier to control – and eventually eliminate when the time comes. Of course, if direct land acquisitions become problematic, these tyrants have many other strategies prepared. For instance, by adding a few more carefully selected species to the Endangered Species List, land-use restrictions can be imposed on a species’ habitat that can cripple rural economies forcing farmers to sell off the land they own to protect “biodiversity.” Then, too, in the past, those whose land the Feds desired have been “removed” from the scene leaving that land “available” for the taking. The Biden administration is also preparing to bring back Obama’s Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule that will impose federal zoning on millions of acres of private land. Former governor of Nebraska, Pete Rickets believed the 30 X 30 plan would leave economic devastation in its wake. According to Rickets when he spoke in 2021, “Right now, 97% of Nebraska is privately owned, and if you wanted to set aside 30% of this in conservation, you would drive up land prices [and] make it more difficult for young people to get into production agriculture,” the Republican governor told a Daily Signal podcast, “You would certainly drive-up food prices [and] . . . property taxes.” So, just what does Executive Order 14008 mandate? First, the EO puts “the climate crisis (!) at the center of United States foreign policy and national security! In Section 102, the EO states: This order builds on and reaffirms actions my Administration has already taken to place the climate crisis at the forefront of this Nation's foreign policy and national security planning, including submitting the United States instrument of acceptance to rejoin the Paris Agreement. In implementing—and building upon—the Paris Agreement's three overarching objectives (a safe global temperature, increased climate resilience, and financial flows aligned with a pathway toward low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development), the United States will exercise its leadership to promote a significant increase in global climate ambition to meet the climate challenge. The matter goes on at great length to show how completely our government and the rest of the governments of the world will work together to make false claims of impending disasters into a means by which every man, woman and child will come under the direct control of what will become a world government in the name of the New World Order. Neither is this all a matter of ecology. Very much involved is our nation (and the world’s) financial status. For instance, the EO mandates: Group and the International Monetary Fund, to promote financing programs, economic stimulus packages, and debt relief initiatives that are aligned with and support the goals of the Paris Agreement; and (iii) develop, in collaboration with the Secretary of State, the Administrator of USAID, and the Chief Executive Officer of the DFC, a plan for promoting the protection of the Amazon rainforest and other critical ecosystems that serve as global carbon sinks, including through market-based mechanisms. Meanwhile, (h) The Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Energy shall work together and with the Export-Import Bank of the United States, the Chief Executive Officer of the DFC, and the heads of other agencies and partners, as appropriate, to identify steps through which the United States can promote ending international financing of carbon-intensive fossil fuel-based energy while simultaneously advancing sustainable development and a green recovery, in consultation with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs. And so on and on – and on. Meanwhile, Section. 103 is involved with: Prioritizing Climate in Foreign Policy and National Security in order to ensure that climate change considerations are central to United States foreign policy and national security. Again, this step involves numerous other steps to the point at which one wonders what will happen if a true crisis arrives during this insanity! Who will be available to deal with it? And still it goes on as we see in PART II—TAKING A GOVERNMENT-WIDE APPROACH TO THE CLIMATE CRISIS. Under this heading we see the interesting confluence of climate and health issues. Under the heading Section 201: Policy, the ghost of pandemics past are recovered and reused: Even as our Nation emerges from profound public health and economic crises borne of a pandemic, we face a climate crisis that threatens our people and communities, public health and economy, and, starkly, our ability to live on planet Earth. Despite the peril that is already evident, there is promise in the solutions—opportunities to create well-paying union jobs to build a modern and sustainable infrastructure, deliver an equitable, clean energy future, and put the United States on a path to achieve net-zero emissions, economy-wide, by no later than 2050. We must listen to science—and act. (One has to wonder who the climate’s Dr. Fauci will be!) We must strengthen our clean air and water protections. We must hold polluters accountable for their actions. We must deliver environmental justice in communities all across America. The Federal Government must drive assessment, disclosure, and mitigation of climate pollution and climate-related risks in every sector of our economy, marshaling the creativity, courage, and capital necessary to make our Nation resilient in the face of this threat. Together, we must combat the climate crisis with bold, progressive action that combines the full capacity of the Federal Government with efforts from every corner of our Nation, every level of government, and every sector of our economy. And again it goes on and on (and on and on) for many pages to the point at which even the least knowledgeable among us wonders when our government will have time to do anything else or how the rest of us will survive as we suffer and starve in preparation for a planet-killing bad thing whether of weather or health! The simple fact is that our government had no right to even consider doing this much less doing it on the basis of an Executive Order! If we let 14008 stand, then there will be nothing left to save from “climate change” or the next manufactured pandemic. Time to wake up, folks, while we still can. Indeed, IF we still can.